Under ASCA standards, in which situations can confidentiality be broken?

Under ASCA standards, confidentiality can be broken when there is a risk of harm to the student or others. This principle is rooted in the duty of the counselor to prioritize the safety and well-being of students and the community. When there is credible evidence or reasonable suspicion that a student may be at risk of hurting themselves or someone else, it becomes imperative for the counselor to act in order to prevent potential harm. This action aligns with legal and ethical obligations to protect individuals in dangerous situations, making it a critical aspect of the counselor's role.

In contrast, breaking confidentiality based on a student's request lacks the necessary context for safety and does not inherently necessitate the release of information. Changes in school policy or funding issues do not provide justifiable reasons to breach confidentiality either, as these factors do not relate directly to threats of harm and could potentially compromise the trust established in the counselor-student relationship. Maintaining confidentiality is essential for creating a safe environment where students feel secure in sharing sensitive information, but ensuring safety in cases of potential harm takes precedence according to the ASCA ethical guidelines.